Skip to content

JPG → WEBP

JPG to WEBP converter

Drop a JPG and get a WEBP that weighs about a quarter less at the same visual quality. The re-encode happens in this tab, so client photographs never cross the network.

Drop JPG files here

or

WEBP adds a second generation of lossy compression to pixels that were already compressed, so keep the quality high; the JPEG's EXIF block does not carry over.

How to convert JPG to WEBP

1

Load the JPEG file

Drop the file or pick it from disk. The extensions .jpeg, .jpe and .jfif are all JPEG input, and each file is converted on its own.

2

Choose a high quality

Because the picture is compressed twice, 90–95 keeps it looking untouched; dropping to 75 trades visible detail for a few more kilobytes.

3

Save the WEBP asset

Save it as a site asset: every current browser renders WEBP, and the picture can sit on the page beside older JPEG fallbacks.

What happens when a JPG becomes WEBP

JPEG and WEBP both use block-based lossy compression, so this is not a move from a lossy world to a lossless one — it is a re-encode. WEBP's encoder is simply more efficient: at a quality a viewer can perceive, it needs roughly 25–35% fewer bytes than JPEG for the same picture, and it can also hold an alpha channel and animation.

Two consequences follow. The pixels pass through a second quantisation, so the quality should be set high enough that the trip is invisible. And the JPEG's metadata — EXIF timestamps, GPS, the orientation tag — is not written into the WEBP, which is a privacy gain and a loss if the capture data mattered. Keep the JPEG for print or archival work; WEBP is a delivery format.

JPG to WEBP questions

How much smaller is WEBP than JPG, really?

Google's comparisons put it at about 25–35% fewer bytes for equal perceived quality, and most pictures land inside that band. Flat, low-detail images gain less; busy photographs gain more. The result panel reports the exact new size.

Does converting back and forth damage my photo?

Every lossy save costs something, and this one is a second generation on an already compressed file. At quality 92 to 95 the difference is not visible at normal viewing sizes; if the picture will be edited and re-saved many times, work from the JPEG or a RAW copy.

Where does my photo go while it converts?

Nowhere: the decode and the encode both run on APIs inside this tab, so the picture never reaches a server. There is no queue, no sign-up and no watermark, and it keeps working once loaded, even with the Wi-Fi off.

Is there a file-size ceiling?

64 MB per image and one conversion at a time. Everything is held in memory in the tab, so a larger JPEG belongs in a desktop tool; for ordinary photos and website assets the ceiling is far away.